F | T | Y | I | Utilizamos cookies para asegurar su mejor experiencia en nuestra web. Si sigue utilizando este sitio asumiremos que está de acuerdo.
This Forensic Guide to the Investigation, Recovery and Analysis of Human Skeletal Remains was published within the context of Project “Promoting Justice for the Extrajudicial Killings and Enforced Disappearances in Colombia, Peru and Guatemala”, conducted by the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), in partnership with the Asociación Red de Defensores y Defensoras de Derechos Humanos (Network of Human Rights Advocates Association) (Colombia) and the Equipo Argentino de Antropología Forense (EAAF), to promote accountability and reparation in cases of extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances. For its Guatemalan and Peruvian chapters, the project has relied on the cooperation of the Fundación de Antropología Forense de Guatemala (FAFG) and the Equipo Peruano de Antropología Forense (EPAF).
It is important to note that, beyond their similarities, the search for victims of enforced disappearance in the three countries has evolved along different paths. In some cases, it has been characterized by the strong presence of the state (as in Colombia and, to a lesser degree, Peru); in others, as in Guatemala, the state has been completely absent. At the same time, it should be underlined that search processes in the three countries have never been linear. In the case of Colombia, the search was carried out during domestic conflict, whereas in Guatemala and Peru this process started after violence was over (in 1992 and 2002, respectively).
The objective of the forensic guide is to provide a practical and simple tool for cases that involve the investigation, recovery and analysis of human skeletal remains for purposes of identification and determination of cause of death in contexts of human rights violations and infringement of international humanitarian law.
These cases are very often dealt with by state institutions specialized in ordinary criminal cases or mass disasters, which leads to errors at different phases of the investigation. This guide is therefore intended to address complex cases in which the perpetrator is not an individual but state officials, parastatal forces or rebel groups.
It is not designed to replace any existing manual on the subject prepared by institutions or any academic textbook on the matter, but to serve as a common action protocol for all organizations performing forensic tasks, both at the official and non-official levels, in Colombia, Peru and Guatemala.
It is important to highlight that these three countries have a more than 20-year forensic tradition devoted to this type of cases, which means that much of what is stated in this document has become daily practice in their respective forensic areas.
The guide is also intended to reach diverse target audiences. On the one hand, lawyers, judges, prosecutors, the police, and forensic teams, but also families of victims and their associations. As the audience is heterogeneous, plain language was used, free from any technicality or complex words.
The guide is based on the Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016), but it is mainly devoted to forensic aspects and cases involving skeletal remains rather than fresh or decaying corpses.
It aims at pointing out the minimum elements of the investigation in each of its phases, without purporting to exhaust all the possibilities available. Thus, institutions implementing it will find it easier to reach consensus on working methodologies and the use of common forms, as well as to adapt the guide to each particular context.
This guide somehow reflects 35 years of uninterrupted forensic practice in Latin America, involving complex cases, different judicial systems and an intermittent interaction with state agents responsible for conducting investigations, such as lawyers, judges, prosecutors, police forces and forensic experts.
The guide has taken into account the perspective of the family members of those affected by violence, their constant fight for truth and justice, and the resourcefulness they have had to develop over time to interact with institutions that are reluctant to carry out a prompt, independent and effective investigation.
The participation of the victims’ relatives in the investigation process has gained ground in the three countries, with differences according to their respective context. Therefore, it is also the purpose of this guide to spread knowledge and foster exchange between two sectors usually kept separate and at opposite poles: justice operators and victims’ family members. However, the persistent work of the human rights organizations has undoubtedly been the main engine to urge states to investigate and prosecute the perpetrators of crimes under investigation. This has been crystal clear in the three countries.
On many occasions, reference is made to the “participation” of the victims’ relatives in these processes, without mentioning however what that participation means. There have been many different modes of participation, but in our opinion, the victims’ families and their organizations should sit at the table where the political decision as to the type of mechanism to be used for search purposes is taken.
We believe that, while the tasks of recovering bodies or gathering antemortem data should not fall within the relatives’ sphere of responsibility, they should however be informed about legal and technical procedures as well as authorized to make consultations, have access to forensic reports, pose questions to the forensic experts involved, challenge them by resorting to their own forensic experts if they do not agree, and dispose of the bodies as they wish. To take the victims’ family members merely as passive antemortem data givers is undoubtedly a frequent mistake.
One of the most evident and negative results of the violence that swept across Latin America in the last 60 years was the enforced disappearance and death of thousands of people. From Mexico up to Argentina and Chile, violence took very different forms —it was typically perpetrated by military dictatorships that seized power by overthrowing legitimately elected governments (Brazil, Uruguay, Chile, Argentina, Guatemala, among others), but also civilian governments inflicted it (as in Mexico, Colombia and Peru).
With the return of peace and democracy, the search for, recovery and analysis of bodies became key elements in the transition towards democratic rule. The relatives of victims of enforced disappearance and violence played a key role in making the new governments take action and investigate past events. The so-called Truth Commissions and the actions taken by the judiciaries were basic mechanisms implemented by the region for that purpose. In turn, the regional system of justice, under the Organization of American States (OAS), as well as the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, with their investigations and rulings, played a fundamental role in the process.
On the forensic side, new mechanisms had to be adopted given the situation. A lack of trust in public forensic experts in many countries combined with a lack of experience with skeletonized bodies gave rise to new forensic initiatives outside the scope of the state, namely EAAF, FAFG, EPAF, and others in Chile, Uruguay, Colombia and Mexico.
With the passing of time, the forensic practice, which until then had remained unrelated to the wishes, needs and rights of the victims’ relatives, started to incorporate a “social” component, thus conferring credibility and transparency to processes lacking these essential components in the past.
It is in this context that, in 1991, a group of legal and forensic experts gathered by the University of Minnesota prepared the so-called “Minnesota Protocol” (Manual on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-Legal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions (1991)), which was approved by the United Nations. This protocol was updated in 2016 and describes the minimum standards required for investigations into cases such as the ones that were beginning to be investigated in the region.
In 2020, several decades after the events, investigations are still underway to find the victims of enforced disappearance and killings in different Latin American countries, particularly in Colombia, Peru and Guatemala. The experience gained and the achievements made have been important, as in some cases they have contributed to devising a work method that is applicable to similar contexts of violence in other parts of the world.
However, thousands of persons are yet to be found and it is imperative that those responsible for investigating and administering justice be equipped with common practical tools, such as the ones provided by this guide, in order to help them improve their investigations and their response to the victims’ relatives.
“Gestionamos un banco de datos genético, destinado a la identificación de personas víctimas de desaparición forzada entre 1974 y 1983. Ese banco de datos está compuesto por la información genética recuperada de los cuerpos que ha exhumado el Equipo. Esa información se cruza con la de los familiares que nos contactan”.
@MatiColombatti y @GabyDelelisi entrevistaron a Natalia Federman, directora del @EAAFoficial, en el programa radial @MalditaSuerteFM (@eldestaperadio). Conversaron sobre el trabajo del Equipo Argentino de Antropología Forense, como las identificaciones de los cuerpos recuperados en Pozo de Vargas (Tucumán), el Plan Proyecto Humanitario Malvinas y la identificación de migrantes del Proyecto Frontera.
Entrevista completa en Link en BIO
La campaña “Tenés una historia, tenés un derecho” del @EAAFoficial, invita a los familiares de víctimas de desaparición forzada por el Terrorismo de Estado entre 1974 y 1983 a contactar al Equipo
Teléfono: 0800 345 3236
Mail: iniciativa@eaaf.org.ar
Si tenés un familiar desaparecido, tenés derecho a saber si fue encontrado.
#EAAF #AntropologiaForense #Identidad #EquipoArgentinodeAntropologiaForense #CienciaParaLaVerdad #Forense #CienciasForenses #OrgulloEAAF #LesaHumanidad #Identificaciones #Restos #RestosOseos #RestosNoIdentificados #Familiares #PerfilesGenéticos #ADN #Donantes #LaboratoriodeGenéticaForense #Muestras #Identificacion #Entrevista #MalditaSuerte ...
El Equipo Argentino de Antropología Forense y la Clínica de Derechos Humanos de la Facultad de Derecho de Columbia colaboraron con la Fiscalía de la Corte Penal Internacional (CPI) en la investigación forense realizada en República Centroafricana. A partir de este trabajo, la Oficina del Fiscal de la Corte Penal Internacional emitió un comunicado de prensa del que compartimos sus principales párrafos:
“El Fiscal de la Corte Penal Internacional (“CPI”), Karim A. A. Khan QC, anunció hoy la finalización de una etapa clave del trabajo de un equipo de expertos forenses desplegado por su oficina en la República Centroafricana (RCA). A través de un acuerdo entre el @eaafoficial y la Clínica de Derechos Humanos de la Facultad de Derecho de Columbia, la Oficina de la Fiscalía trabajó para conducir las exhumaciones y el examen forense de presuntas víctimas en apoyo a las investigaciones en curso sobre crímenes cometidos en República Centroafricana en el conficito del año 2013”. (...)
“Llevando adelante este trabajo en estrecha coordinación con las autoridades nacionales, el equipo de expertos de la Fiscalía realizó exámenes forenses completos, incluídas autopsias y análisis de artefactos. Para posibilitar la identificación de las víctimas, se recolectaron muestras de ADN tanto de los restos humanos como de las familias de las víctimas”. (...)
“Esta sinergia ha incluido el despliegue de más de 20 expertos técnicos de 10 países, incluidos arqueólogos, patólogos, odontólogos, antropólogos, expertos en balística y técnicos de morgue. La Misión Multidimensional Integrada de Estabilización de las Naciones Unidas en la República Centroafricana (“MINUSCA”) también ha brindado asistencia significativa en la planificación e implementación de este trabajo”. (...)
Link al comunicado original en inglés y en español en BIO.
@internationalcriminalcourt @columbialawschool ...
BÚSQUEDA LABORAL ‼️
Abrimos una búsqueda laboral para la posición a tiempo completo “Control de Calidad y Procesos” (Codificación y Flujos de Trabajo, entre otros) para la Dirección Centro y Norte América del EAAF con residencia requerida en Ciudad de México y bilingüe español/inglés.
Las tareas consisten en asistir a un equipo de expertos forenses multidisciplinario del @eaafoficial que trabajan en investigaciones de violaciones a los derechos humanos o problemas humanitarios; controlar y monitorear procedimientos y flujos de trabajo que incluyen gran cantidad de datos, codificación de casos, muestras y otros elementos dentro de esas investigaciones.
Requisitos:
- Habilidades para manejar y subir a distintas plataformas gran número de datos; excelente atención a detalles y control de calidad; experiencia en monitoreo de flujos de trabajo y softwares de flujos de trabajo y control de calidad; experiencia en catalogar, manejo de archivos e inventarios.
- Requiere ser bilingüe (español/inglés).
- Tiempo completo (40 hrs. por semana).
- Residencia en la Ciudad de México, México y potencialmente, debe de estar dispuesto/a a viajar dentro del país y, ocasionalmente, a países de la región.
- Título universitario, preferentemente de disciplinas que se ajusten a los requerimientos de este puesto de trabajo tales como informática, bibliotecología, archivista, control de calidad y flujos de trabajo, entre otros.
- Conocimiento en biología y genética forense son bienvenidos pero no indispensables; pueden desarrollase en procesos de inducción.
Para aplicar a este puesto envíar su resume/Curriculum Vitae, con una carta de interés y tres referencias.
Correo: ny.office@eaaf.org.
Recepción de postulaciones: hasta el 15 de julio de 2022.
Link a postulación completa (Link en BIO) ...